His Honour Humphrey LLoyd, QC is an arbitrator and mediator. He is a member of the JAMS Global Engineering and Construction Group and of its Advisory Board. From 1963 until 1993, he was a barrister in England, becoming Queen’s Counsel in 1979 at a relatively early stage, specialising in construction and related law. He has edited The International Construction Law Review
, since its foundation in 1984. He acted as advocate and was appointed arbitrator in many domestic and international arbitrations, e.g. Chairman of an Arbitral Tribunal for a dispute about a major highway in a Middle Eastern State; co-arbitrator in a dispute about a freight- handling facility in a French Port; co-arbitrator in a dispute about a U.S. military project in Saudi Arabia. In 1980, he became one of the UK representatives on the Commission on International Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce, working on many groups and writing the seminal ICC Report on Construction Industry Arbitrations and a Report on Drafting Awards in international arbitration.
From 1993 until 2005, he was a judge of what is now known as the Technology and Construction Court in London, part of the High Court of Justice. That court deals almost exclusively with construction and other complex disputes, such as contracts relating to computers and computerised systems. During his time on the Bench, His Honour Humphrey LLoyd tried many such cases. He also delivered numerous judgments, including the very first, about the new statutory system of adjudication that applies to most construction contracts in the United Kingdom. He was also one of the few judges then to be selected by parties for appointment as arbitrator for major cases.
In 2005, His Honour Humphrey LLoyd returned to being an arbitrator in international and domestic matters, practising once again from Atkin Chambers, in Gray’s Inn, London. He joined JAMS in 2008.
Experience and Qualifications
His Honour Humphrey LLoyd’s judgments as a judge are mostly matters of public record and can be obtained from the British and Irish Legal Information Institute (http://www.bailii.org/) website or from published case reports and commentaries. The major cases included Amstrad vs. Seagate (about hard disk drives); Harmon vs. House of Commons (about public works contract procurement); Royal Brompton Hospital vs. Hammond (about a new hospital building); Birse vs. Eastern Telegraph (about a building of innovative design).
As an arbitrator, appointments have included the following representative matters.
- Dispute between Japanese Company and Norwegian Company concerning the performance of compressors for oil production in Africa. (Sole arbitrator)
- Dispute between members of a consortium of Japanese and Danish companies about responsibility for multi-million claims arising out of desulphurisation plant contract in the United Kingdom. (Chairman of Arbitral Tribunal)
- Dispute between Middle Eastern Company and Airport Authority about improvement work at European Airport. (Co-arbitrator)
- Dispute between two African companies concerning the construction of an oil pipeline in West Africa. (Co-arbitrator)
- Dispute between two Asian companies concerning claims and the valuation of work done under EPC Contracts for the production of ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer within oil industry industrial complex in England. (Sole arbitrator)
- Dispute concerning claims between multi-national companies arising out of encountering of unexpected ground and other conditions in a segment of the £1.8 billion Channel Tunnel Railway Project. (Sole arbitrator)
- Dispute concerning industrial plant in Middle East between German Company and local Company. (Co-arbitrator)
- Dispute concerning multi-million pound claims and payments on a large CCGT Plant in North West England. (Sole arbitrator)
- Dispute concerning the amount of final payment due on a major hospital design and build contract in the United Kingdom. (Sole arbitrator)
- Dispute concerning the performance by a leading U.S. Architectural firm’s services. (Sole arbitrator)
- Dispute concerning the performance of the contractor and principal sub-contractor in the construction of a new multi-million pound headquarters for a UK government department. (Sole arbitrator)
- Dispute concerning the professional negligence of consulting engineers engaged on a large tunneling project in Hong Kong. (Sole arbitrator)
- Dispute concerning the provision of radio communications equipment for a mass transit system in Europe - a multi-party arbitration involving four multi-national parties. (Sole arbitrator in each of the conjoined arbitrations)
- Multi-million pound delay claim by multi-national consortium and owner over contract for upgrading of communications for mass transit railway system in Europe. (Sole arbitrator)
- Multi-million pound dispute between international project participants concerning a new ticketing and gating system for a London Underground’s mass transportation network under a PPP/PFI scheme (by means of a sophisticated computerised system). (Sole arbitrator)