Submit a Case Submit Case Find a Neutral Search Neutral
Randall Newsome

Hon. Randall J. Newsome (Ret.)

JAMS Mediator, Arbitrator, Referee/Special Master, Neutral Evaluator

Case Manager
Kathleen Hanley
T: 415-774-2617
F: 415-982-5287
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1500, San Francisco, CA 94111

Randall J. Newsome is available to conduct cases virtually. JAMS is equipped to provide virtual ADR services on a variety of online platforms, including Zoom, Microsoft Teams, WebEx, and more.


Hon. Randall Newsome (Ret.) successfully served as a mediator in hundreds of cases both as a full time neutral at JAMS as well during his 28 years as a settlement and bankruptcy judge.  He has handled both local and national matters involving complex bankruptcy and commercial issues.

Judge Newsome is sought out for his intelligent and pragmatic approach to resolving complex matters involving multiple parties with difficult group dynamics. He has a unique ability to bring about successful resolution while enhancing the parties’ continuing relationship.

Most recently, before joining JAMS, Judge Newsome was chief judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California. He also previously served as a visiting judge in the Central District of California, the Western District of Washington, the District of Nevada, and the District of Arizona. Between 2001 and 2003 he was a visiting judge in the District of Delaware, where he presided over numerous complex matters.

ADR Experience and Qualifications

  • Mediated more than 200 disputes acting as a settlement judge
  • Handled hundreds of bench trials requiring oral and written decisions
  • Assigned the Baldwin-United Corp case--the largest Chapter 11 case in U.S. history--after less than a year as a federal judge
  • Mediated notable Chapter 11 case of Pacific Gas & Electric Company. After three months of effort, the debtor and the California Public Utilities Commission reached a resolution of their disputes, thereby allowing the confirmation of a plan of reorganization

Representative Matters

Business and Contract Disputes 

  • Appointed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court as the mediator for the PG&E bankruptcy
  • As court-appointed mediator in the 2019 PG&E chapter 11 case over a period of eight months, Judge Newsome assisted the parties in arriving at settlements involving over $20 billion in claims, which allowed the company to reorganize successfully
  • Handled numerous attorney fee disputes
  • Handled a contract dispute between and a French wine producer and a US distributor 
  • Disputes between an NYSE-listed software company and parties involved in an assignment for the benefit of creditors that allegedly was a fraudulent transfer
  • A dispute between a major oil company and a small oil producer involving an offshore oil lease
  • A license dispute between an NYSE-listed software company and the principals of a software service provider
  • Served as a court-appointed provisional director/receiver under California law in a dispute between family members regarding an agri-business
  • Served as a neutral evaluator to a trustee of the largest Ponzi scheme bankruptcy and SIPC proceeding in history
  • A dispute between principals of major restaurant chains and their main creditor, resulting not only in resolution of the issues, but the sale of the chains to a Canadian buyer
  • Served as a judge in a mock trial involving billions of dollars in potential fraudulent transfer liability arising out of legacy environmental issues
  • A contract dispute between a convention center in a major metropolitan area and a telecommunications provider
  • A dispute involving allegations of fraudulent transfer arising out of an asset purchase agreement in which the trustee alleged that the defendant paid less than reasonably equivalent value
  • Mediated to settlement disputes between the California Public Utilities Commission and the debtor, a utility, which allowed confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.  This mediation took place over a three-month period, and dealt with issues beyond bankruptcy law.  The mediation not only enabled the debtor to exit bankruptcy, but established a new and much-improved working relationship between the parties
  • A dispute between two law firms involving allegations of fraudulent transfers following failed merger discussions
  • A dispute between the debtor, a jewelry company, and a hedge fund, which was the jewelry company’s largest creditor.  Resolution of this dispute, which involved claims of abuse of common control by a holding company largely owned by the hedge fund, enabled the parties to reach a consensual plan of reorganization
  • A case involving a trustee's objection for amounts allegedly due as an investment banking fee
  • A breach of contract matter between a debtor and investment company where the parties had entered into a settlement agreement regarding the sale of real property in Hawaii and that agreement then became the subject of a partially-completed arbitration
  • Numerous fraudulent transfer claims requiring numerous mediation sessions with various groups of former shareholders of a failed San Francisco based law firm
  • A breach of contract dispute brought by a dissolved law firm against a former client of the firm for failure to pay a contingency fee of at least $13 million that may (or may not) have come due. The client counterclaimed for $50 million alleging that the law firm had breached its fiduciary duties to the client and misled the client as to the firm's financial condition
  • A dispute brought by a dissolved law firm against the new law firm of several former shareholder partners, alleging fraudulent transfers against the former shareholders, and recovery under Jewel v. Boxer against the new law firm
  • A case involving a plaintiff challenging the validity of the defendant’s copyright and trade dress claims
  • A securities class action involving allegations of stock manipulation, omissions and misrepresentations under Rule 101-5 and Section 20(d) by a publicly held company trading on the OTC Bulletin Board
  • A case where the plaintiff/trustee sought recovery of nearly $13.5 million in transfers to a Georgia bank made by a company involved in the payroll administration business


  • A breach of contract case involving the employment agreements of two officers of a bankrupt company. The issues centered on whether there was a requirement to disgorge compensation as well as the levels of future compensation
  • Contract negotiations resulting in a new collective bargaining agreement between the employer and a union
  • A dispute involving sexual harassment claims 

Sports and Entertainment

  • Disputes involving an NYSE-listed video game company and various parties
  • A dispute between multiple creditors and a professional hockey player
  • A dispute between creditors and the directors and officers of a film animation studio
  • A dispute between a production company and German hedge fund over the video game rights for a major movie franchise
  • A dispute over the issuance of a bankruptcy discharge to a well-known music personality
  • Hundreds of millions of dollars in disputes involving dozens of secured creditors, two creditors’ committees and the debtor for an entertainment company.  The agreements reached provided the framework for a consensual chapter 11 plan that ultimately was confirmed
  • Disputes involving financially troubled golf courses and country clubs
  • An ownership dispute over a limited partnership interest in a professional basketball team

Health Care

  • A three-day mediation among secured creditors, administrative claimants, state and federal governmental entities, and labor unions regarding a hospital in chapter 11


  • A long-pending suit brought by a mortgage company against its former principal implicating a directors & officers insurance policy
  • A dispute involving insurance fraud and in pari delicto issues between a bank and investment company
  • Claims against a principal of a manufacturer implicating D&O policies
  • Malpractice claims against the trustee of a mortgage trust resulting in a recovery under D&O policies
  • Retained by a group of reinsurers to testify as an expert in a dispute with a primary insurer arising out of an asbestos bankruptcy
  • A multi-million dollar dispute implicating fidelity insurance policies arising out of conduct by a bank vice-president
  • An insurance coverage dispute between a solar roofing company and its insurer
  • A dispute regarding premiums owed by an insured to a workers compensation insurer


  • A dispute in a restaurant bankruptcy between the unsecured creditors committee and the debtor's lender involving lender liability (among other issues)
  • A dispute involving over 70 fast food restaurant franchises that were assets in two chapter 11 cases in which a trustee had been appointed. The trustee and the principal lender for the chapter 11 entities were embroiled in a dispute over how much money the lender should receive as a result of the sale of the restaurants
  • Disputes related to a retail liquor store chain involving approximately 75 leases

Decisions from the Bench

  • In Read-Rite Corp., 2006 WL 1214839 (N.D. Cal. 2006) (opinion affirming my ruling that Seagate had no rights to a replacement license under a nonexclusive patent cross-licensing agreement with Read-Rite)
  • In re Read-Rite Corp., 2006 WL 2241107 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2006) (the principal issue involved whether IBM, and its successor Hitachi, obtained the patent licensing rights for their hard disc drive division under a cross-licensing agreement with Read-Rite).
  • In re TEU Holdings, Inc., 287 B.R. 26 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002)(motion to dismiss denied as to causes of action against officers and directors for breach of fiduciary duty and corporate waste)
  • In re Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 285 B.R. 864, 60 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 578 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002) (exclusion of evidence regarding the measurement of airborne asbestos under the Daubert standard)
  • In re Tower Air, Inc., 268 B.R. 404 (Bankr. D. Del. 2001)(rights of a secured lender to insurance proceeds under Arizona version of UCC 9-104)
  • Matter of Ripley Oil Co., Inc. 71 B.R. 631 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio,1987)(oil tanks were “equipment” rather than “inventory” under Ohio’s version of 9-109(2) and (4))
Completed Virtual ADR training conducted by the JAMS Institute, the training arm of JAMS.

  • Honoree, Lawdragon Global Restructuring Advisors & Consultants Guide, 2020
  • Registered Mediator, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
  • President, subsequent to being Vice-President, National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges
  • Fellow, American College of Bankruptcy
  • Member, American Law Institute
  • Lecturer, Federal Judicial Center, since 1986
  • Taught principles of bankruptcy jurisdiction to newly-appointed U.S. District Judges since 1994
  • Regularly serves on educational programs for the Federal Judicial Center, ALI-ABA, the National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges, Practising Law Institute, American Bankruptcy Institute, Midwest Bankruptcy Institute, American Insolvency and Restructuring Advisors, and others
  • Appointed Chief Bankruptcy Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California, 2004–2010
  • Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California, 1988-2003
  • Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Ohio, 1982-1988
  • Lawyer, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, OH, 1978-1982
  • J.D., University of Cincinnati College of Law, 1975
  • B.A., summa cum laude, Boston University, 1972

Counsel Comments

    • "I've been in a lot of big-time negotiations over my 30 years of doing this. Randall Newsome is the best I've ever seen."

      - Attorney
    • "Many thanks [Judge Newsome] for your assistance today in resolving the matter [...] the result was a fair one for all concerned and it once again reaffirmed my enthusiasm for mediation when conducted by a determined and skilled mediator."

      International Attorney and Chief Executive Officer of Litigation Firm
    • “[Judge Newsome’s] skillful approach to resolving the matter…ultimately resulted in a complete consensual resolution of the matter…” 

      - Attorney
    • “Judge Newsome is the best mediator I've ever worked with, and have been involved in dozens of mediations. He's the most prepared, knowledgeable and tenacious, an excellent questioner and works extremely hard to get to a deal.”

      - Los Angeles Bankruptcy/Restructuring Attorney
    • “Judge Newsome is simply fabulous.”

      - Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney
    • “Judge Newsome was excellent.”

      - Partner Miami Law Firm



Practice Areas

  • Arbitration
  • Banking
  • Bankruptcy
  • Business/Commercial
  • Employment
  • Federal Judge
  • Financial Markets
  • Governmental/Public Agency
  • Professional Liability
  • Real Property
  • Securities
Available nationwide


This page is for general information purposes.  JAMS makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or completeness.  Interested persons should conduct their own research regarding information on this website before deciding to use JAMS, including investigation and research of JAMS neutrals. See More