Submit a Case Submit Case Find a Neutral Search Neutral
Thomas Vanaskie

Hon. Thomas I. Vanaskie (Ret.)

Case Manager
Alyssa DeTreux
T: 215-246-9494
F: 215-246-0949
1717 Arch Street, Suite 3810, Philadelphia, PA 19103


Hon. Thomas I. Vanaskie (Ret.) joins JAMS after a distinguished 24-year career on the federal bench. Judge Vanaskie was sworn in as a circuit judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 2010. He previously served more than 16 years as a district judge for the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, including a seven-year term as chief judge. In his tenure on the bench, Judge Vanaskie oversaw hundreds of complex cases involving a wide range of practice areas, including appellate, business/commercial, class action/mass tort, employment, federal law, insurance, antitrust, intellectual property, civil rights and personal injury/torts.

Judge Vanaskie is particularly known for his expertise in technology and e-discovery. He is a contributing member of the Sedona Conference Working Group 1 on Electronic Document Retention and Production and Working Group 11 on Data Security and Privacy Liability. From 2001 to 2008, he served on the Information Technology Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States, the policymaking body for U.S. courts. Judge Vanaskie was appointed chair of the Judicial Conference Information Technology Committee by the late Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist in 2005. He was a member of the Third Circuit Judicial Council and presently co-chairs its Information Technology Committee. Since 2007, he has served as an adjunct professor of law at the Penn State and Dickinson School of Law, presenting a course on electronic evidence. In 2016, Judge Vanaskie was appointed by Chief Justice John Roberts to serve on the Judicial Conference Space and Facilities Committee.

ADR Experience and Qualifications

  • On the district court, Judge Vanaskie regularly conducted settlement conferences resulting in the resolution of hundreds of cases. As the chief judge, Judge Vanaskie won approval from his colleagues for the development of a court-sponsored mediation program.
  • On the court of appeals, Judge Vanaskie was approached by his district judge colleagues to conduct mediations, and he successfully resolved several difficult and high-profile cases.

Representative Matters


  • In re Pressure Sensitive Labelstock Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1556 (Multi-district class action alleging a conspiracy to fix prices in the self-adhesive labelstock industry): Published opinions reported at 226 F.R.D. 492 (M.D. Pa. 2005), 356 F. Supp. 2d 484 (M.D. Pa. 2005); 566 F. Supp. 2d 363 (M.D. Pa. 2008)
  • Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc., No. 3:CV–96–1794 (Action by toilet partition manufacturer asserting antitrust violations, false advertising and interference with contracts): Published opinions reported at 14 F.Supp.2d 710, 69 F.Supp.2d 678, 249 F.Supp.2d 463, aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 401 F.3d 123 (3d Cir. 2005)

Class Action/Mass Tort

  • Bauer v. Bayer A.G., M.D. Pa. No. 3:CV-03-1687 (Class action by beekeepers alleging defendant’s insecticide decimated honey bee population): Published opinion reported at 564 F.Supp.2d 365
  • In re Schering Plough Corp. Intron/Temodor Consumer Class Action, 3d Cir. Nos. 10–3046, 10–3047 (Putative class action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act concerning marketing campaigns to influence physicians to prescribe drugs for off-label uses): Published opinion reported at 678 F.3d 235

Federal Law

  • Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Sebilius, 3d Cir. No. 10–4584 (Action concerning $5.6 million overpayment to state under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program): Published opinion reported at 674 F.3d 139
  • Santomenno ex rel. John Hancock Trust v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co., 3d Cir. No. 11–2520 (ERISA action claiming excessive fees on annuity insurance contracts offered to plan participants): Published opinion reported at 677 F.3d 178


  • Jeffrey v. Ashcroft, M.D. Pa. No. 3:CV–00–1442 (Disability discrimination claim based upon chronic obstructive pulmonary disease): Published opinion reported at 285 F.Supp.2d 583
  • Woodard v. Fedex Freight East, Inc., M.D. Pa. No. 3:CV–06–1968 (Action under the Fair Labor Standards Act alleging violations of overtime provisions): Published opinion reported at 250 F.R.D. 178

Civil Rights

  • Blackhawk v. Pennsylvania, M.D. Pa. No. 3:CV–99–2048 (Action by Native American asserting violations of First Amendment rights by state in refusing to grant exemption from fee requirements to possess black bears): Published opinions reported at 114 F.Supp.2d 327, 225 F.Supp.2d 465. Affirmed 381 F.3d 202
  • Padilla v. Miller, M.D. Pa. No. 3:97–CV–0873 (Civil rights action based upon alleged unlawful search and seizure during a roadside stop): Published opinions reported at 143 F.Supp.2d 453, 143 F.Supp.2d 479


  • T.H.E. Insurance Co. v. Charles Boyer Children’s Trust, M.D. Pa., No. 3:CV-04-1652 (Coverage dispute involving commercial lines insurance policy and mud and water damage to a bowling alley): Published opinion reported at 455 F.Supp.2d 284, aff’d, 269 Fed. Appx. 220
  • Fidelity and Guaranty Ins. Underwriters, Inc. v. American Buildings Co., M.D. Pa., No. 3:CV–95–129 (Application of the anti-subrogation rule in context of property insurer’s action against warehouse manufacturer): Published opinion reported at 14 F.Supp.2d 704

Personal Injury/Torts

  • Spence v. ESAB Group, Inc., 3d Cir., No. 09–4363 (Action for damages sustained when load being carried by tractor trailer shifted and tractor trailer overturned): Published opinion reported at 623 F.3d 212
  • McAndrew v. Garlock Equipment Co., M.D. Pa. No. 3:CV-03-0872 (Products liability action concerning exploding thin wall tubing used in roofing industry): Published opinion reported at 537 F.Supp.2d 731

Intellectual Property

  • Laminations, Inc. v. Roma Direct Marketing, LLC, M.D. Pa., No. 3:CV–06–2108 (Patent infringement action concerning self-watering planter): Published opinion reported at 516 F.Supp.2d 404
  • New Dana Perfumes Corp. v. The Disney Store, Inc., M.D. Pa., No. 3:CV–00–1345 (Trademark infringement action by owner of the Tinkerbell trademark): Published opinion reported at 131 F.Supp.2d 616
  • Adjunct Professor of Law, Penn State and Dickinson Schools of Law, 2007–present
  • Co-Chair, Third Circuit Task Force on Libraries
  • Board of Directors, Lackawanna Bar Association
  • Board of Directors, Northeastern PA Trial Lawyers Association
  • Member, Lawyers’ Advisory Committee, Middle District of Pennsylvania
  • Member, Civil Justice Reform Act Group, Middle District of Pennsylvania
  • Alumni Fellow, Penn State University Alumni Association, 2014
  • President, Our Lady of Lourdes Regional High School Alumni Association
  • Chair, Board of Trustees, Scranton Preparatory School, 2001–2003
  • Member, Phi Kappa Phi Honorary Society, Lycoming College
  • Member, Academic All-American Hall of Fame (Football), 2013
  • Member, Middle Atlantic Conference Hall of Fame (Football), 2018
  • Member, Lycoming College Athletic Hall of Fame (Football), 1994
  • First Team, Academic All American, College Division (Football), 1974

Judge Vanaskie is a sought out speaker on the topic of technology and e-discovery.  Select examples of recent speaking engagements include:

  • May 3-4, 2018, Nashville, TN, Presenter on the Judicial Roundtable and on the Trade Secret Panel at the midyear meeting of Working Group 1 on Electronic Document Retention and Production of the Sedona Conference
  • September, 18-19, 2017, San Diego, CA, Presenter at the meeting of Sedona Conference Working Group 11
  • February 24, 2017, New York, NY, Practicing Law Institute, Presenter on Parallel Civil Proceedings arising from Government Investigations of Data Breaches
  • September 28, 2016, Washington, D.C., George Washington University Law School, Keynote Address: “The Legal and Policy Dimensions of Cybersecurity in a Decentralized Environment:  A Case Study of the Federal Judiciary’s Experience,” presented at Symposium on Legal and Policy Dimensions of Cybersecurity
  • October 23, 2015, Washington, D.C., Panel Member, ABA/Duke Civil Data Project Roundtable
  • October 3, 2015, Washington, D.C., Keynote Speaker and panelist at Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS) annual E-Discovery Conference – Panel Member
  • March 5 and 26, 2015, Presenter for Sedona Conference Webinar, ESI in the Criminal Justice System
  • March 23, 2015, New York, NY, Practising Law Institute, Government Investigations 2015 – Electronic Information in Investigation and Response.
  • Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 2010–2018
  • District Judge, United States District Court of the Middle District of Pennsylvania, 1994–2010
    •  Chief District Judge, 1999–2006
  • Attorney; Elliott, Vanaskie & Riley; 1992–1999
  • Attorney, Dilworth Paxon Kalish & Kauffman, 1980–1992
  • Law Clerk, Chief Judge William J. Nealon, Middle District of Pennsylvania, 1978–1980
  • J.D., cum laude, Dickinson School of Law, 1978 (member, Law Review, Appellate Moot Court Board and International Law Moot Court Team)
  • B.A., magna cum laude, Lycoming College, 1975



Practice Areas

  • Appellate
  • Business & Commercial Law
  • Class Action & Mass Tort
  • Cybersecurity & Privacy
  • Employment Law
  • Federal Law
  • Insurance
  • Personal Injury/Torts
  • Smart Contracts & Blockchain
Available nationwide


This page is for general information purposes.  JAMS makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or completeness.  Interested persons should conduct their own research regarding information on this website before deciding to use JAMS, including investigation and research of JAMS neutrals. See More