Is Your Arbitration Clause Outmoded?
Although arbitration is a “creature of contract” and many arbitrations proceed in the manner outlined in the arbitration clause, it is not unusual for the parties and their counsel to alter the terms of the original clause to suit the dispute at hand. Often a dispute has arisen years after the arbitration clause was drafted, and circumstances have changed. The clause may no longer be appropriate. Although the parties and their lawyers may have strong disagreements on the merits of the case, they understand that stipulating to a customized process that suits the dispute is a huge benefit to everyone involved. This flexibility is one of the strong points of the arbitration process.
The following suggestions are just a few of the ways to alter an outmoded clause:
1. Select One Arbitrator
One goal of these stipulations is streamlining the arbitration process to make it more cost-effective. When the clause calls for a panel of three arbitrators, counsel can make the process less costly and often more efficient by stipulating to use a sole arbitrator. Although the parties may prefer a tripartite panel for a complex, “bet-the-company” case, choosing an experienced solo arbitrator can save time and money and does not involve extreme risk. Counsel have an opportunity to review the arbitrator’s disclosures, to contact others about their experiences with the arbitrator and even to interview the arbitrator if there are concerns about fairness and the handling of the case. Interviewing arbitrators has become a common practice, and a good way to do it is to meet with the candidate in the presence of the other side to ask various questions about how the candidate manages cases, while, of course, avoiding queries about the merits of the dispute.
2. Select a Provider to Administer the Case
Arbitration participants often express a preference for a particular ADR provider based on factors such as experienced case managers, efficient administrative procedures, cost and a comfortable, high-quality hearing space. While the arbitration clause may identify a particular provider, the parties may have had a negative experience with that provider in the past and may want to switch. Therefore, it is not unusual for counsel to stipulate to a different, preferred provider. As long as both parties agree, this is an easy process that will make the experience smoother and less frustrating for both sides. Case managers are trained to assist with such a change.
This page is for general information purposes. JAMS makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or completeness. Interested persons should conduct their own research regarding information on this website before deciding to use JAMS, including investigation and research of JAMS neutrals. See More