JAMS Arbitration and Mediation Services logo
JAMS Arbitration and Mediation Services tag line
Enter your search term

Practice: Mediation

The JAMS Mediation Process

Rigorous preparation. Creative, collaborative solutions. Persistent follow-up. It's the power of difference only JAMS mediators deliver.

At JAMS, mediation is not limited to just a few hours or a day-long session. It's a process—one at which our mediators and case managers excel. We work diligently every step of the way—from pre-mediation calls and preparation to post-mediation follow-up—toward helping all parties arrive at the best possible outcome to their dispute. As the world's pre-eminent provider of mediation services, we draw on nearly four decades of experience in successfully resolving tens of thousands of cases of every type and size.

JAMS Mediation Advantage Video

;

Unparalleled Neutral Expertise
JAMS offers clients access to the most qualified neutrals. Our mediation panel includes highly respected federal, state and appellate judges, former litigators and transactional attorneys from diverse backgrounds and practice areas. Recognized leaders in ADR, they are equipped with the legal and business acumen, credibility and settlement skills required to resolve even the most contentious and complex matters.

Process Proficiency
JAMS neutrals are on the case long before the day of mediation and don't consider their job done until settlement is achieved. They are dedicated to the entire mediation process, from reading the written statements to final execution of the settlement agreement.

Pre-mediation calls—JAMS mediators often provide parties the opportunity for pre-mediation calls in order to discuss:

  • how to craft a mediation process tailored to your dispute
  • when the mediation should take place and who should attend
  • how to exchange information and whether opening statements will be allowed
  • issues the mediator should be aware of that are not included in the written statements

During the mediation session—Using their extraordinary interpersonal skills, JAMS mediators listen closely to all perspectives, quickly evaluate party dynamics and establish rapport, leaving ample time for them to focus on:

  • what issues are in dispute and what might motivate each party to settle
  • making candid observations when appropriate and assisting both sides in assessing risk, overcoming impasse
  • pursuing creative, collaborative solutions that are consistent with the facts of the case and geared toward preserving mutual interests and ongoing relationships
  • ensuring that all parties trust the process and feel they have been heard and that all reasonable prospects for settlement have been considered
  • guiding parties toward resolution

Post-mediation—In the event that all issues are not resolved during the mediation session, JAMS mediators are tenacious and follow up in an effort to keep parties engaged in the process and focused on resolution. They will persist until the case settles or every conceivable option has been exhausted.

Practice-Focused Training
Our neutrals augment their deep subject matter expertise and comprehensive knowledge of federal and state case law and statutes with extensive, ongoing training in ADR and developing trends, including academic research and recent court rulings on settlements.

Efficient, Affordable ADR
We offer affordable hearing formats, including half-day options, for every dispute. JAMS mediators have demonstrated their ability to resolve cases promptly and efficiently, providing significant savings of time and expense.

Responsive Case Management
JAMS case managers—many of whom have strong backgrounds in the law—receive ongoing training on legal and procedural issues. Known for their excellent customer service and efficiency in convening mediations and keeping them on track, they are also astute at helping parties select the mediator who best fits their needs.

Resolution Centers Worldwide
JAMS is the world's largest private provider of ADR services, with 26 offices in North America and Europe as well as affiliate offices in Italy, Ireland and The Netherlands.

December 22, 2016
Law 360
November 28, 2016
New York Law Journal
September 1, 2016
The American Lawyer
September 1, 2016
Daily Report Online
August 17, 2016
Daily Journal
August 2016
Plaintiff Magazine
July 28, 2016
Daily Business Review
July 22, 2016
Daily Journal
June 27, 2016
Law360
June 15, 2016
Law.com
Spring 2016
Feature Articles: Employee versus Independent Contractor: The Latest; ADR Options in Employment Trade Secret Matters; Classification of Laborers in the Sharing Economy; Sandquist: Who Decides?
June 1, 2016
California Lawyer
May 20, 2016
Law360
Spring 2016
The Bar Journal
April 12, 2016
New Jersey Law Journal
April 7, 2016
Daily Journal
April 6, 2016
California Lawyer
April 4, 2016
LegalTech News
April 2016
The Circuit Rider
March 28, 2016
New York Law Journal
March 25, 2016
Daily Journal
March 24, 2016
Law.com
March 11, 2016
Daily Journal
March 7, 2016
New Jersey Law Journal
February 19, 2016
InsideCounsel.com
February 12, 2016
Daily Journal
February 8, 2016
New York Law Journal
February 5, 2016
Mass Torts Litigation, Winter 2016, Vol. 14 No. 2
February 4, 2016
Law.com
January 12, 2016
InsideCounsel.com
January 2016
Orange County Lawyer
January 2016
Alternatives, Vol. 34, No. 1
Winter 2015 - 2016
JAMS Washington State Newsletter Winter 2015 - 2016
Winter 2015 - 2016
JAMS Washington State Newsletter Winter 2015 - 2016
December 9, 2015
Law.com
November 20, 2015
Daily Journal
November 16, 2015
New York Law Journal
November 16, 2015
Texas Lawyer
November 13, 2015
Daily Journal
November 11, 2015
Law.com
October 16, 2015
Daily Journal
Fall 2015
ABA Dispute Resolution Magazine
September 2015
Plaintiff Magazine
September 10, 2015
Law.com
September 2015
Advocate
Summer 2015
JAMS Video
Summer 2015
JAMS Video
Summer 2015
JAMS Video
Summer 2015
JAMS Video
August 12, 2015
Law.com
August 2015
California Lawyer ADR Resource Guide
Spring 2015
Dispute Resolution Magazine
July 31, 2015
Daily Journal Verdicts & Settlements
July 10, 2015
July 8, 2015
Law.com
June 8, 2015
LAW360
May 26, 2015
Law.com
May 7, 2015
Law.com
May 5, 2015
Daily Business Review
April 6, 2015
Law.com
Spring 2015
The Green Bag, Volume 18 Number 3
March 30, 2015
New York Law Journal
March 26, 2015
Law.com
February 19, 2015
Law.com
February 5, 2015
Law.com
January 28, 2015
Law.com
January/February 2015
Consumer Attorneys Of California
December 11, 2014
Law.com
December 9, 2014
Law.com
August, 2014
Corporate Counsel
August 5, 2014
Law.com
June 2014
ABA Section of Litigation, ADR Committee Newsletter
May 2014
DRI
March 14, 2014
Daily Journal
March 15, 2013
Law 360
July 2011
Plaintiff Magazine
March 16, 2017
February 24, 2017
February 1 - 4, 2017
January 26, 2017
January 18 - 20, 2017
January 12, 2017
December 5, 2016
December 2, 2016
November 18, 2016
November 9 - 12, 2016
November 9, 2016
October 27, 2016
October 12 - 27, 2016
October 20, 2016
October 20, 2016
October 20, 2016
October 19, 2016
Webinar
October 19, 2016
October 19, 2016
October 18, 2016
October 18, 2016
October 13 - 14, 2016
October 13, 2016
October 13, 2016
October 12, 2016
October 9 - 11, 2016
October 6, 2016
October 5 - 7, 2016
October 5, 2016
September 30, 2016
September 29, 2016
September 23 - 24, 2016
September 21 - 22, 2016
September 21, 2016
September 20, 2016
September 13 - 15, 2016
September 12, 2016
August 25, 2016
August 18, 2016
August 5, 2016
June 16, 2016
June 4, 2016
April 21, 2016
February 26, 2016
February 25-26, 2016
February 23-24, 2016
February 23, 2016
February 11, 2016
February 1, 2016
January 27 - 30, 2016
January 19, 2016
December 4, 2015
November 20, 2015
November 19, 2015
November 19, 2015
November 16-17, 2015
November 12, 2015
November 6, 2015
October 30, 2015