Judges Disclose How They Prep Complex Cases For Settlement
Source: California Lawyer
Date: June 1, 2016
www.callawyer.com “the web portal for California’s lawyers” F rom employment-related class action suits and racial discrimi- nation cases to movie studio executives in dispute with producers over a ? lm in the entertainment industry, media- tion is becoming the preferred way to avoid costly litigation. The average intellectual property case costs between $475,000 and $500,000 to litigate compared to mediation where costs do not usually exceed $100,000, according to a World Intellectual Property Organiza- tion survey. JAMS is the largest private alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provider in the world with more than 300 full-time neutrals, resolving more than 12,000 cases per year in hearing locations throughout the world in nearly all areas of law including business and commercial cases. Based on past results, JAMS takes pride in the fact that almost all of the cases medi- ated, even the most complex, are success- fully resolved. Two prominent neutrals, Retired Judge Carl West and Retired Judge Richard Kram- er, weigh in on how to manage these cases so that they are prepared to settle outside of court in mediation. What is the process for managing and settling complex cases? Judge West: What’s essential is to talk about the expectations of the parties par- ticipating in the mediation and purpose of the mediation. In more complex cases, me- diation efforts can extend over a long period of time. The parties need to decide whether they want to seriously position the case for settlement discussions, and if so, how the mediation effort will further that goal. Judge Kramer: First, I determine what the issues are, streamline the resolution of them, watch the behavior of the litigants then make judgments as to what might be really going on. I test some of my judgments to see if they are helpful or whether they exacerbate the problem. Judge West: The best strategy is for each side to take the time to determine their expectation and goals. If they haven’t, I will work with them to iden- tify their expectations and how best to achieve them. What are indicators that a case is complex? Judge West: They have a number of attributes. The common denomina- tor is a substantial amount of money or an intangible issue that needs to be resolved in order for the parties to get out of the litigation A complex case may also have multiple parties, many competing interests, and novel factual or legal issues that must be identi? ed and resolved if the case is to be settled. All of those interests have to work together with the mediator to de- velop an approach to the management of the parties, issues and ultimately the mediation effort. Another characteristic of a complex case is presence of novel or unique questions of law or fact that drive the dispute between or among the parties. Judge Kramer: These are cases that need more intensive judicial supervision due to the nature of the issues, the number of par- ties to the litigation, the amount of money at stake, the complexity of the fact issues and the like. Judge West: I advise narrowing down the issues so you can evaluate the case. Experts can help to evaluate damage and liability issues. Sometimes allowing experts to work through the more technical issues will help to bring the parties together. What are some of the obstacles to pre- paring to settle a complex case? Judge Kramer: It’s usually a lack of infor- mation, fear, greed or bluster. The solution is to determine what’s getting in the way of a rational business decision. Judge West: There’s generally, at the ? rst level, a challenge to getting information on the table that both sides need to evaluate. There may be discovery issues and levels of cooperation that are lacking to facilitate mediation. My job is often to facilitate the exchange of information necessary to sup- port a successful mediation effort and to help the parties get necessary information on the table to move forward with the media- tion. Sometimes, there are personalities that come into play or there could be a history or emotional elements between the parties that need to be overcome to objectively medi- ate the case. There also could be business 1 Judges Disclose How They Prep Complex Cases For Se tt lement BY JULIETTE FAIRLEY | JUNE 1, 2016 SPONSORED CONTENT Hon. Richard Kramer (Ret.), JAMS mediator and arbitratorconsequences to the dispute. If you have an ongoing relationship, you may need to consider how a settlement will impact the relationship or if the ongoing relationship is an impediment to resolution. Judge Kramer: If you get adverbs, adjec- tives and vitriol, you are alerted to the prob- lem being that the parties are not getting along or it could be a failure to communi- cate. The process of settling is dynamic. You watch what’s unfolding and react to it. Judge West: I suggest identifying the sig- ni? cant issues that drive the case or dispute and focus the discovery on those issues before mediation. Once the parties and the mediator have their arms around the sig- ni? cant legal and factual issues, the case is prepared for an effective mediation in which the mediator can help the parties focus re- solving the case. What one thing do complex cases have in common? Judge West: In larger scale litigation, every case at some point early on was involved in a mediation or ADR process. When early efforts to resolve a case fail, the parties will often engage in a second round of mediation efforts as the case approaches trial or some other potentially dispositive event. I get a lot of cases that had early mediation and want to try again. Because of the cost of litigation, par- ties are motivated to ? nd an alterna- tive to litigation that is economical and ef? cient. Getting people together for a serious mediation effort is often the best way out of litigation. ADR or mediation is not going away because litigation costs are not dropping. They are steadily rising and, as a result, mediation is going to remain a growth industry. Hopefully, we are becom- ing more ef? cient at resolving sooner rather than later. What sequential approach do you employ towards a settlement? Judge Kramer: My job is to spot the problems and work them out and sometimes it is sequentially. I am con- stantly looking at what the problem is and what I can do to help it. Judge West: We get extensive mediation briefs on larger cases in which lawyers put forth the best case scenarios. They need to explain to their clients that the “best case” described in their brief will not be what will come out of a mediation. Lawyers need to make sure their clients understand that a successful mediation will require compromise. When both parties are prepared to compromise, when they recognize that there is another side to the story, then we are on our way to a settlement. Often having parties exchange mediation briefs will provide each side with a better appreciation of the risks of remaining in the lawsuit. What can each party do to position the case for settlement? Judge Kramer: You need the authority to settle and the right person in the room to evaluate it. When you are judge, you can order that. When you are engaged in ADR, you cannot order anyone to do anything but you can explain that it’s the best way of do- ing things. Face to face is good if you can get a senior person with settlement authority to see what’s going on as opposed to being contacted by phone by a lawyer who may articulate things in a way that may not be helpful to settlement. Judge West: The parties and their counsel need to have the necessary information to permit them to effectively evaluate their ex- posure or likely recovery. This often means recognizing the signi? cant factual or legal issues that fuel the case and making an hon- est effort to consider and evaluate the risks associated with the issues. Judge Kramer: Putting it in writing will me- morialize it and gives me the time to think about it before session. If it’s a settlement conference, identify the problems, explain what you want the person who is presiding to do about it and why this is the solution rela- tive to what the other side is saying. Don’t tell me what the other side is trying to pull. Don’t use adjectives and adverbs. Come with an open mind that perhaps this settlement pro- cess could work and perhaps the mediator can add something to the process. The right attitude is important. What are your favored processes that have helped parties prepare to settle? Judge West: I require a mediation brief out- lining the issues driving the case. I arrange a pre-mediation conference call with lawyers for three reasons. First, we discuss their briefs. Second, to assess where they are in relation to the other side and third, to make sure they both have their goals de? ned before engaging in the mediation process. I look to determine whether their goals are compatible and if not, to ? nd ways to bring them together. It is important for the parties to come to the mediation with the same goals or at least compatible goals. Judge Kramer: Parties spend too much time trying to convince the mediator or jus- tice the virtue of their position. You are trying to compromise not win a fan. Convincing the judge that you are right won’t work be- cause settlement judges don’t think like that. If you solidify your position, it makes it hard to be ? exible and the lawyer is often showing off for the client which doesn’t help. Cases fall into whether a statute is unconstitutional or whether the government has done some- thing right or wrong. When preparing for a settlement in a complex case, seek out an economic rational resolution because there usually is one. 2 www.callawyer.com “the web portal for California’s lawyers” Hon. Carl West (Ret.), JAMS mediator and arbitrator Juliette Fairley has written about law and the legal profession for Inside Counsel, Bloomberg Big Law Business, MainStreet, California Lawyer and other publications. Reprinted with permission from the Daily Journal Corporation.