Submit a Case Submit Case Find a Neutral Search Neutral

When Catastrophes and Construction Defect Litigation Collide

Stacy L. La Scala, Esq.
Stacy L. La Scala, Esq.
JAMS Mediator, Arbitrator, Referee/Special Master, Hearing Officer

Published

However, with the potential inclusion of a claim stemming from nature’s wrath, many experts will opine on structural deficiencies, with a focus on the element of nature’s wrath rather than the claims at issue, without the aid of destructive testing, and they will typically include them in a notice, report, defect list, or cost of repair.

Should there be a catastrophic event during the early phases of the dispute process, typically no destructive testing will have taken place to confirm the early observations and opinions of the claimant’s consultants. And without the destructive testing to support the allegations and further identify significant damage from an event, the claimant may point to the previously alleged construction deficiencies as the direct cause of the resultant damage after the catastrophic event.

Full Article Below:

EXPLORE MORE ON THESE TOPICS

Disclaimer:
This page is for general information purposes.  JAMS makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or completeness.  Interested persons should conduct their own research regarding information on this website before deciding to use JAMS, including investigation and research of JAMS neutrals. See More

Stay updated on the latest in mediation, arbitration and dispute resolution.

The JAMS ADR blog serves to engage our clients, the legal community and the public in a discussion about alternative dispute resolution. As leaders in mediation, arbitration and more, we strive to remain at the forefront of legal developments, trends and news in areas of law that pertain to ADR.

Yes, I would like to receive email communications regarding news, articles, events, and resources from JAMS.