JAMS ADR Insights
Settlement Negotiation Ethics for Attorney-Advocates in Litigated Cases
At some point after a civil dispute enters the legal system, opposing counsel will likely engage in some form of discussion to resolve the case. If attorneys don’t initiate direct negotiations or early mediation, or if they do and the case doesn’t resolve, they are likely to receive judicial encouragement at a case management conference to voluntarily explore settlement through a court’s alternative dispute resolution program. Separately, courts use meet and confer requirements to promote settlement talks. If a case has not resolved and trial is approaching, attorneys are likely to find themselves at the negotiating table by judicial fiat. California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1380 authorizes a court to set one or more mandatory settlement conferences on its own motion.
Full Article Below:
EXPLORE MORE ON THESE TOPICS
This page is for general information purposes. JAMS makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or completeness. Interested persons should conduct their own research regarding information on this website before deciding to use JAMS, including investigation and research of JAMS neutrals. See More