Skip to main content

Challenges of proving standing and causation in California wildfire-related death and illness claims

In California, recovery for wildfire-related harm requires both proof of standing and a causal link to the defendant’s conduct.

California’s wildfires have produced devastating losses, including fatalities, respiratory illness and long-term health impacts for those exposed to them. Impacted victims and their families frequently seek compensation from those believed to be responsible. California law provides multiple legal remedies—including causes of action for negligence, wrongful death, public nuisance, inverse condemnation and product liability—but the right to pursue these claims, ab initio, depends upon two prerequisites: proving standing to bring the claim in the first instance and establishing causation between the wildfire and the claimed damage or injury. 

Full article below:

Open in new window

California’s wildfires have produced devastating losses, including fatalities, respiratory illness and long-term health impacts for those exposed to them. Impacted victims and their families frequently seek compensation from those believed to be responsible. California law provides multiple legal remedies—including causes of action for negligence, wrongful death, public nuisance, inverse condemnation and product liability—but the right to pursue these claims, ab initio, depends upon two prerequisites: proving standing to bring the claim in the first instance and establishing causation between the wildfire and the claimed damage or injury. 

Full article below:

Open in new window

Related Topics

Latest Insights

View All Latest Insights
Banner with “Stay Connected” text, subscribe and events buttons, and a photo of people networking in a modern office.

Stay Connected

Sign up to hear about upcoming events or to access information or recordings of past events and webinars.

Subscribe View All Events
Scroll to top