AI Use In Arbitration Faces Red-Line Questions
An apparently novel decision in Canada setting aside an arbitral award for overreliance on artificial intelligence raises several important questions, including: How much is too much reliance on AI, and in the absence of glaring issues like hallucinations, how would you even be able to tell?
As AI tools become more mainstream, and in many instances unavoidable, there seems to be a consensus among arbitration practitioners that arbitrators and counsel are both going to be using the tools. Even so, one thing that people in the industry seem to agree on is that arbitrators should not be outsourcing their decision-making to AI.
Full article below:
An apparently novel decision in Canada setting aside an arbitral award for overreliance on artificial intelligence raises several important questions, including: How much is too much reliance on AI, and in the absence of glaring issues like hallucinations, how would you even be able to tell?
As AI tools become more mainstream, and in many instances unavoidable, there seems to be a consensus among arbitration practitioners that arbitrators and counsel are both going to be using the tools. Even so, one thing that people in the industry seem to agree on is that arbitrators should not be outsourcing their decision-making to AI.
Full article below:
Related Topics
Latest Insights
Stay Connected
Sign up to hear about upcoming events or to access information or recordings of past events and webinars.