Who Picks the Arbitrator: You or the Algorithm?

​Should parties and institutions rely on AI to select arbitrators? Can algorithms promote neutrality, diversity, and efficiency - or do they risk entrenching bias and eroding trust?

Join us at the JAMS Miami Resolution Center for a structured mock arbitration hearing. This dynamic session hosted by JAMS and Jus Mundi on Thursday, February 11th, features:

• ​Counsel advocating for AI-assisted arbitrator selection
• ​Counsel opposing the proposition
• ​A three-member tribunal that will examine both positions and deliver a non-binding opinion

Agenda:

• 5:30 PM - Doors Open
• 6:30 PM - Program
• 7:30 PM - Reception

​Speakers:

• ​Tribunal:
  • ​William Hill – Shareholder, Gunster, Miami
  • ​Annie Lespérance, FCIArb – Head of Americas, Jus Mundi
  • ​Patricia H. Thompson, Esq., FCIArb, CollArb – Arbitrator & Mediator, JAMS, Miami (will serve as Tribunal Chair)
• ​Counsel Advocating for AI-Assisted Arbitrator Selection:
  • ​Robert Mahari – Associate Director, Stanford Code X Center, Palo Alto
  • ​Giuseppe De Palo, Esq. – Arbitrator & Mediator, JAMS, New York
• ​Counsel Opposing the Motion:
  • ​Enrique Molina –  Senior Associate, White & Case, Miami
  • ​Sarah Reynolds, FCIArb – Partner & Head of International & Domestic Arbitration, Kaplan & Grady, Chicago