Skip to main content

The Goldilocks Problem: Trade Secret Protection for AI

By David Baake

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to revolutionize the economy, courts are increasingly being asked to determine whether AI models and algorithms can be protected as trade secrets. Yet case law reveals that plaintiffs often struggle to obtain trade secret protection for their models, even for programs that contain elements that are both valuable and secret, because the plaintiff has not identified the program at the right level of particularity. The difficulty lies in describing the technology in a way that is general enough to be “understood by a lay person,”
but detailed enough to separate it from “special knowledge of those persons skilled in the trade.” See Neural Magic v. Meta Platforms, 659 F. Supp. 3d 138, 166 (D. Mass. 2023). 


Full article below:

Open in new window

Disclaimer:

This page is for general information purposes. JAMS makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or completeness. Interested persons should conduct their own research regarding information on this website before deciding to use JAMS, including investigation and research of JAMS neutrals. See More

Disclaimer

This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the JAMS website is intended to provide general information about JAMS and an opportunity for interested persons to contact JAMS. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  JAMS neutrals are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of JAMS services. While JAMS endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, JAMS makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

SEE MORE

Scroll to top